IRAN 2009, IRAN 1953: It’s now widely accepted that the coup that installed the hated Shah in power in Iran in 1953 was engineered by Western intelligence agencies, mainly the CIA. The same thing appears to be happening there now, with the exception that the Zionists who now dominate the U.S. actually prefer Ahmadinejad to be in power for a while, as long as that power is tenuous and “we” have the ability to inflame the radicalism and violence of both sides. Their goal: either an engineered “color revolution” or war, either of which — they hope — will result in a puppet government that will be subservient to Israel and welcome “foreign investors” (read: the multibillionaire media elite). Note well the not-too-widely reported fact that independent pre-election polls showed Ahmadinejad a two-to-one victor, a far greater margin than even Obama’s victory in November.
HAS ANYONE NOTICED?: “Our new president” has dismantled the NSA’s and CIA’s and FBI’s wiretapping and snooping programs… hasn’t he? He’s stopped the wars in the Middle East… right? And lobby groups for special interests like Wall Street and Israel no longer rule Washington… as promised, right?
Sorry, but… those were just more lies. What we have in Washington now is not the legal government of the United States of America. It is an illegal, illegitimate regime. Both ruling parties are complicit in its crimes. It uses the symbols and trappings of the original government; it uses the names and titles and some of the forms of that government; but it is in its essentials exactly the kind of government the Constitution was written to prevent.
ANTHRAX ATTACKS WORTHY OF STUDY: With Rahm Israel Emanuel, son of a member of the violent terrorist group Irgun, now the actual ruler of the United States (with “anti-war” Obama as a figurehead), expect to see a continuation of the Zionist wars in the Middle East, with some withdrawals from already-destroyed Iraq as a cover. One distinct possibility is an engineered or covertly encouraged “terror incident” to stampede ignorant Americans into supporting a new war, this time against Iran (with open incursions into Pakistan or Syria also possibilities).
A similar technique was used in 2001 to get the boobs hyped up for the current wars; see Robert Pate’s excellent piece solving the mystery of the anthrax attacks for details. [NOTE, MAY 2d, 2009: Presently Robert Pate’s site is offline, as it was one of the sites recently defaced by hackers. I am working on restoring it.]
SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL MANDATORY: According to the Yeshiva University Commentator (which parses Barack Hussein Fetchit’s statements on the Middle East in Talmudic detail), pro-Zionism is for all practical purposes required for all candidates in the US these days, declaring that they all “will declare their undying support for the State of Israel.”
NOT INTERESTED: Presidential elections in the United States are about as real as WWF wrestling matches — while small details may vary, all the important possibilities are choreographed in advance; all the major candidates (and the major ones are the only ones with a chance, thanks to the media controllers, as Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul well know) have been vetted by our masters beforehand.
Another good analogy is the electoral system in the old Soviet Union. Practically speaking, there’s not much difference between a one-party system and a two-party system. As the old adage goes, if elections could change anything, they’d be illegal.