How Shall I Kill Thee? Let Me Count the Ways

Benjamin Netanyahu, who emphasizes the concept of Israel as a racial state for Jews

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 28, 2018

by Kevin Alfred Strom

JUST THIS WEEK Israel instituted a new version of its “Nationality Law” which makes it even more explicit that citizenship there is for Jews — racially defined as those of Jewish descent — and for Jews only, and that non-Jews in Israel have zero right to self-determination or full citizenship.

It’s long been that way in Israel — Israel being for Jews only. From Wikipedia we learn that only Jews, their spouses, and descendants, have a right to immigrate to Israel and become citizens under the

Israeli Nationality Law of 1952, which . . . defines the criteria under which a person is regarded a citizen of Israel. The Law of Return entitles Jews and their spouses and descendants to migrate to Israel, though it does not itself bestow Israeli citizenship. In general, the primary principle of Israeli citizenship is jus sanguinis (citizenship by descent), rather than jus soli (citizenship by place of birth).

Israel’s new law — which has essentially constitutional status as a “Basic Law” — makes it clearer than ever that Israel is a racial state: 1) Israel is defined as “a nation-state for the Jewish people”; and 2) the Jewish people — and only the Jewish people — in Israel “have an exclusive right to national self-determination” — in other words, non-Jews have no right to self-determination.

Addressing the Israeli Knesset after the passage of the law, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, “This is our country. The state of the Jews. But in recent years there have been some people who have been trying to undermine that, and by so doing, to undermine the foundations of our existence and rights.”

So, as Israeli law states, now more explicitly than ever, “the primary principle” — the primary principle — “of Israeli citizenship is jus sanguinis (citizenship by descent), rather than jus soli (citizenship by place of birth).” Citizenship by descent! If you translate the Latin term literally, by the right of the blood. By blood indeed. By race.

America was once a nation in which citizenship was defined by the right of the blood — the Founding Fathers, in their Naturalization Act of 1790 — which stood for more than a century and a half after that — defined American citizenship as open to men and women of White European descent only. What happened to our right of the blood? Jewish plotters corrupted our lawmakers and our judiciary and overturned it, defining as “American” any invader or squatter or cannibal managing to make landfall between two imaginary lines drawn on a map. They changed our laws to make America “more comfortable” for them, to dilute our political and cultural power with millions of invaders, a course of action which ultimately will leave us dead and forgotten in the land we created and built.

As in America, so also in Germany. The Jews — with their tremendous influence there, enforced by judaized America — have now changed the laws and policies of Germany so that the dregs of Africa and the Middle East are flowing into that country like a storm surge of millions of gallons of raw sewage — and are proclaimed to be “new Germans.” The Jewish media and bought politicians declare that to exclude these invaders from residence or citizenship is a sin and a crime of the very worst kind. The Germans — a distinct people who have existed for thousands of years — are thus denied their right of the blood too, and will soon cease to exist if something radical is not done soon.

So it is also in almost every country where White people live. We are denied our right of the blood — denied our very existence. And denied it by the world’s wealthiest ethnic group, the Jews, who control the media and therefore control the politicians under mass democracy — the very same group which has its own explicitly racial-nationalist state, Israel.

Why do our politicians give the Jewish power structure almost any laws they want — even at times enacting word-for-word the laws as written by Jewish pressure groups? The main reason is that the major media in this country are controlled by Jewish supremacists.

NBC, CBS, and ABC were all founded and continue to be dominated by one ethnic group — Jews. The “big six” media corporations in America today are CBS, NBC Universal, 21st Century Fox, Time Warner, Viacom, and the Walt Disney Company (which now owns ABC). Fully 75 per cent. of the top executives of these companies are Jews, though only two per cent. of the US population is Jewish. This level of control by one tiny ethnic group — and a hostile one at that — is extraordinary, and ought to be an issue of outrage among ordinary Americans. But the media business is a special variety of business — one that can effectively squelch any kind of debate or criticism it chooses.

Could it possibly be coincidence or chance that these top media companies (and many other important media outlets I haven’t time to mention here) are dominated or directly controlled by members of the Jewish minority? Could it be that Jews are uniquely talented in this field, which naturally leads this 2 per cent. or so of the US population to compose such a huge percentage of media executives? Or could it be that Jews are highly racially conscious, tend to help their own at the expense of others, and have made it a particular focus of their efforts to gain control of all the organs of public influence in the West, particularly the United States?

Jews are indeed highly racially-conscious, as both their religious and secular writings confirm. In their colonies around the world — and they are the only people, with the possible exception of the Gypsies, which claims an absolute moral right to colonize the lands of every other people — they form a more effectively united faction than any other ethnic group, and they rail simultaneously for intermarriage and mixing among their host populations — and against intermarriage and mixing for their own people.

A simple test with any search engine will reveal the intensity of Jewish concern over intermarriage with non-Jews, and the staggering number of well-funded efforts they are making to stop it. One rabbi even argues against intermarriage on the basis that Jews have souls that are fundamentally different from the souls of others:

[T]he distinguishing element of the Jew is the Neshamah (soul) that every Jew possesses. The soul of the Jew is different than the soul of the non-Jew. They have different characteristics, potentials and needs. Every Jew has essentially the same type of soul as any other Jew. This Jewish soul is inherited from his or her mother. It is the common denominator that connects the Russian Jew with the Syrian, Yemenite, Canadian or Uruguayan Jew, even though they do not speak the same language and may have different customs and habits. The only meaningful difference between one Jew and another is the level and intensity of expression of this common essence. . . .

Intermarriage — and the energetic Jewish response to it — may, in fact, be, like “persecution” of Jews, a factor in intensifying the extreme ethnocentrism of Jews and in the long run may help preserve the genetic characteristics of the Jewish people. Writer David Duke states in his book My Awakening:

Orthodox groups are certainly the most extremely opposed to intermarriage, but even the newspapers and magazines published by Reform groups strongly discourage it. The Jewish researcher Ellman comments in the journal Jewish Social Studies that the only ethnic or religious community in the United States that continues to attempt to limit and discourage conversions and intermarriage is the organized Jewish community. But Ellman — along with a number of other authors who are strongly opposed to intermarriage — also believes that the seemingly high rates of intermarriage are no real threat to the Jewish heritage. He suggests that it strengthens the traditional Jewish culture and genotype by eliminating those Jews who have assimilationist tendencies.

Let me stress that last point: The Jews who, despite the massive Jewish efforts to prevent intermarriage, insist on marrying non-Jews, are the least racially conscious among their people. As time passes, their genes will largely be lost to the Jewish people, and those Jews who remain identified as Jews will be the most ethnocentric of their already supremely ethnocentric kind. It is a self-reinforcing process, as I pointed out in December 1995:

The essence of Jewishness is not in their distinctive appearance, which some Jews have largely lost over the centuries, nor in their peculiar modes of dress or diet or expression which many non-religious Jews have abandoned anyway without in any way relinquishing their Jewishness. No, the essence of Jewishness is the special “us versus them” mentality which is formalized in their Chosen People myth and which was necessary for their survival as a tiny group among the teeming masses of Egypt, Babylon, Rome, and America. For thousands of years, the Jews were subjected to a rigorous process of genetic selection. Those Jews in whom this “us versus them” mentality, this intense ethnocentrism or “racism,” was weak or absent, were the most likely to intermarry and the least likely to raise their offspring as Jews or induce their spouse to undergo the difficult and officially discouraged conversion process. Thus the genetic material of these less “racist” Jews was lost to Jewry. Thus, over the centuries, those Jews who remained in the fold were those who possessed these special mental qualities to a greater degree, and these qualities became intensified over the years since only those who possessed them to the highest degree were the progenitors of the following generations of the people who called themselves Jews.

Jews have, in their colonies, their own racially-exclusive religious institutions, their own racially-exclusive schools, their own racially-exclusive publications, their own racially-exclusive social institutions including racially-exclusive dating services, and even in some areas their own racially-exclusive neighborhoods. And, since 1948, they have had their own racially-exclusive state, founded upon oceans of blood of British and Palestinian people and maintained with the treasure and the blood of Americans; Israel — where the sexual slavery of White women is a major industry, and where racial segregation and discrimination has reached such heights that a huge fortified and militarized wall — that puts the Berlin wall to shame — separates Jews from their alleged inferiors.

Medieval Jewish writings show us that Jewish supremacism is not strictly a modern characteristic, lending strength to the thesis that their ethnocentrism is more a biological phenomenon than a cultural or religious one, as the historical quotes assembled for the New Republic in 1992 show us:

[M]edieval Jewish theologians — most notably the poet and philosopher Judah Ha-Levi in twelfth-century Spain and the mystic Judah Loewe in sixteenth-century Prague — sought to define the Jewish distinction racially rather than spiritually . . . [this] view, according to which there is something innately superior about the Jews, was rehabilitated in its most extreme form by Shneur Zalman of Lyady. The founder of Lubavitcher Hasidism taught that there is a difference of essence between the souls of Jews and the souls of gentiles, that only in the Jewish soul does there reside a spark of divine vitality. As for the goyim [that is, all non-Jews] . . . Zalman’s attitude (was): “Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.”

Consequently, references to gentiles in Rabbi Shneur Zalman’s teachings are invariably invidious. “Their (non-Jews’) material abundance derives from supernal refuse. Indeed, they themselves derive from refuse, which is why they are more numerous than the Jews, as the pieces of chaff outnumber the kernels. . . . All Jews were innately good, all gentiles innately evil.”

. . . Moreover, this characterization of gentiles as being inherently evil, as being spiritually as well as biologically inferior to Jews, has not in any way been revised in later Habad writing.

National Vanguard writer Josiah Nott calls this Jewish attitude an extreme example of a “zero-sum mentality” toward other peoples, with whom the Jewish supremacists consider themselves to be continually at war:

[T]he fanatically zero-sum mentality of Jews as a group also strikes me as unique. Yes, most ethnically conscious peoples throughout history (i.e., nearly all human groups outside of contemporary American and European Whites) have had, out of necessity and as a result of evolutionary shaping, something like a zero-sum approach to other peoples. But only the Jews appear to believe that every people among whom they reside or with whom they are in contact is an automatic and detestable enemy, and only the Jews seem to think that every defeat or injury to these other groups is a victory for their own group — and pursue them as such.

Even most historical empires, haughty and arrogant though they were, rarely looked on the (unprovoked) calamities and miseries of their subject peoples as a series of triumphs. Most human groups that are not in the grips of some sort of militarily expansionist ambition will not oppose the interests of another group unless there is a real conflict of interest between them, unless another group is encroaching upon them or their interests. How could White Americans today possibly be perceived as encroaching upon the interests of Jews? But this lack of provocation does not stop the Jewish assault on White Americans, their culture, and their very existence as a people. Jews seem to think that there is always such a conflict, even where none in fact exists.

And where none objectively existed, Jews will create such a conflict, and then claim that they have not and that any who perceive such a conflict between their own group and the Jews are either hateful, delusional, or both — and that moreover any conflict created by Jews that does become so obvious that knowledge of it cannot be entirely suppressed must clearly be the result of the non-Jewish group, and never the Jews themselves.

In her Sonnets from the Portuguese, Elizabeth Barrett Browning wrote these immortal words of love: How do I love thee? Let me count the ways. / I love thee to the depth and breadth and height / My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight / For the ends of Being and ideal Grace.

But from the Jewish power structure, we are looking at — not at words of love, but words, and acts, of hate. We are looking at a belief system based on hate. A power structure predicated and built on hate. At a unique group who, by their words and by their acts, are asking “How Shall I Kill Thee? Let Me Count the Ways.”

Killing: Is my language too strong? I believe that I have proved in this broadcast — and over and over again in those which came before it — that the White people of America and most White nations around the world are being denied every essential thing we need to survive as a people. To survive, every people needs 1) the will to survive as a distinct people; 2) its own exclusive territory; 3) a healthy sexuality; 4) its own government; and 5) control of its own education system and its own media.

I believe that I have also demonstrated that it is the Jewish supremacists who are the main driving force behind denying our people these essentials of survival. And I believe I have also shown that these same Jewish supremacists know exactly what they are doing, for they know that racial-nationalism and all that it implies are the keys to their own survival. They demand for themselves — they work ceaselessly to obtain — they spend their lives in ardent pursuit of the very things they would deny us.

The will to survive as a distinct people that they denigrate among Whites, they celebrate among Jews. The exclusive territory that they claim it is “racist” to demand for Whites, they proudly demand for Jews. The healthy sexuality we used to have in the old White America they attack on every side — from their pro-homosexual films to the ever-more-twisted pornography industry they dominate — while at the same time they preach strong Jewish family values for their own people. No people can survive long without its own government — and while the Jewish establishment preaches that nations comprising a single people — and whose people want to continue that arrangement — are “racist” and “evil,” they themselves demand a territory and a government exclusively theirs in Israel. The Jewish supremacists demand that our schools and our media be aggressively multiracial on every level and in every way — while maintaining their own racially exclusive education system and their own media.

In short, they know what it takes to survive as a people. They work hard to deny us those very things, while at the same time demanding them for themselves. Therefore they clearly are working for our destruction.

More and more of us know these things. More and more of us dream of a new society, one not dominated by the Jewish power structure. More and more of us understand the new power structures we must build to ensure our survival and continuity as a people. I need those of you who are so awakened to awaken others — and to join and support the National Alliance, put your shoulder to the wheel, and make that future real.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. The National Alliance is working to educate White men and women around the world as to the nature of the reality we must face — and organizing our people to ensure our survival and advancement. We need your help to continue. Please send the largest contribution you can afford to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. You can also help us by visiting Make your life count.  Once again, our postal address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.