IRAN 2009, IRAN 1953: It’s now widely accepted that the coup that installed the hated Shah in power in Iran in 1953 was engineered by Western intelligence agencies, mainly the CIA. The same thing appears to be happening there now, with the exception that the Zionists who now dominate the U.S. actually prefer Ahmadinejad to be in power for a while, as long as that power is tenuous and “we” have the ability to inflame the radicalism and violence of both sides. Their goal: either an engineered “color revolution” or war, either of which — they hope — will result in a puppet government that will be subservient to Israel and welcome “foreign investors” (read: the multibillionaire media elite). Note well the not-too-widely reported fact that independent pre-election polls showed Ahmadinejad a two-to-one victor, a far greater margin than even Obama’s victory in November.
MORE WAR RUMBLINGS: It seems that the oligarchs of the so-called “West” (actually, Russia seems to stand for traditional Western values more than America or the EU does these days) not only want to conquer Iran, but to surround and intimidate Russia as well. According to South Ossetian political scientist Irina Kadzhaev, “Georgia’s war against South Ossetia may easily turn into NATO’s war against Russia. This would be a third world war.” And according to Canadian think tank Global Research, American and NATO military men are being trained to regard Russia as “the enemy.”
ACCORDING TO physicist and writer James Miller, the four forces pushing for war with Iran are:
1) ISRAEL (The Israel Lobby is working overtime to get Americans to fight another war on their behalf. The work of the CIA and MI6 is clear in fomenting chaos in Iran and yet another “rainbow-colored revolution” in a country currently without Zionist supervision.);
ANTHRAX ATTACKS WORTHY OF STUDY: With Rahm Israel Emanuel, son of a member of the violent terrorist group Irgun, now the actual ruler of the United States (with “anti-war” Obama as a figurehead), expect to see a continuation of the Zionist wars in the Middle East, with some withdrawals from already-destroyed Iraq as a cover. One distinct possibility is an engineered or covertly encouraged “terror incident” to stampede ignorant Americans into supporting a new war, this time against Iran (with open incursions into Pakistan or Syria also possibilities).
A similar technique was used in 2001 to get the boobs hyped up for the current wars; see Robert Pate’s excellent piece solving the mystery of the anthrax attacks for details. [NOTE, MAY 2d, 2009: Presently Robert Pate’s site is offline, as it was one of the sites recently defaced by hackers. I am working on restoring it.]